This story violates the rules of critical thinking by overgeneralizing and holding biases.
This story is about Michael Phelps and the recent surfacing of a picture of him smoking marijuana at a party. Phelps is not being charged for the crime due to "lack of physical evidence," even though others in the investigation are being charged for possession. This presents a problem in critical thinking:
- Phelps is receiving a bias in the investigation in the sense that his fame status got him out of the penalty for his actions. Many think it is unfair that he receives "special circumstances" because he's a great olympic swimmer. There is a double standard there for him, and also the generalization that famous people get the easy way out.